If you don't know how many people might have opted to move up from 15
hours to 24 hours, don't know how many people might have decided to
submit a log who other wise would not, and don't know how many people
might have decided to participate because they didn't have to put in 40+
hours to be credible ... how on earth can you say at this point that the
Classic category isn't achieving expectations?? Especially since it's
the first year for it.
Dave AB7E
On 11/28/2013 12:16 PM, Edward Sawyer wrote:
After seeing literally more than a dozen well known contesters in each mode
"opt down" for the 24 hours of Classic and others commenting they may try it
next year, I have to ask - is it doing what was intended? Seems to be a
nice choice for those who feel inclined at the moment but taking 40+ hour
contesters down to 24 hours is not "helping contesting" necessarily, folks.
Maybe there are lots of people "opting up" to 24 hours who used to do 10 or
15 hours, I don't know. But it does not seem to be "achieving expectations"
collectively, from where I sit. Maybe the positive results are just not
obvious.
73
Ed N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|