CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO (A) in ARRL 10/160

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO (A) in ARRL 10/160
From: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:00:13 -0600 (CST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On the contrary, I think it is admirable that the ARRL: 
 
First, finally is properly recognizing the need for the Single Op/Unlimited 
category in these events; 
 
and Second, is NOT forcing those who choose to decline the use of spotting 
assistance to directly compete, in their category, with those who do.
 
Why is there this constant need to force people to conform with ideas they 
don't choose to agree with?

On 11/27/13, Randy Thompson K5ZD wrote:

It is too bad the ARRL did not take the forward looking position and use
this opportunity to allow all single ops to use spotting assistance. These
contests would benefit from less categories rather than more.

Randy, K5ZD


> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Aldewey@aol.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 2:28 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO (A) in ARRL 10/160
> 
> Actually, the ARRL PSC DID recently accept the Contest Advisory
> Committee's recommendation to add Single Operator Unlimited Categories to
> ARRL 10 M, ARRL 160 M, ARRL RTTY Round Up, and IARU. However, these
> rules will not kick in until 2014. You will notice that the RTTY RU
> rules have already been changed to accommodate this change for the
> January, 2014 event.
> 
> This rule change for the ARRL 10 M and he ARRL 160 M contest will kick
> in next year.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Al, K0AD
> CAC
> 
> 
> In a message dated 11/26/2013 7:07:20 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> ko7ss@yahoo.com writes:
> 
> Maybe this was discussed here before, but someone needs to refresh my
> memory, why is there no SO (A) category in the two big upcoming ARRL
> contests ?
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>