I totally agree with you Bob.
Last year during CQ WW DX CW, even though I was assisted, I had to wait up
to three minutes on an guy in zone 33 to send his call and confirm who I
contacted.
For other in zone 8, I had to wait 21 Qs before he IDed again.
This year I'll enter SOAB from CE3CT, so the pain will be even worse. Must
be frustrating to spend a minute or two waiting on someone to ID without
even knowing if he already is in your log or not.
Unless this is required by the rules, I believe this will continue.
There are lots of things to shorten:
ENN at a faster speed.
The zone exchange (which is obvious in most cases) also at a faster speed.
EE instead of TU
Test or TST at a faster speed.
etc.
Those thing, like it or not, don't hurt as much as not sending the
station's callsign for such long periods of time.
I believe a reasonable ID ratio is 1:3 (ID:Qs)...1:4 tops. Depending on the
QSO rate at which the running station is working. It should result in folks
IDing once every 20-25 secs, no more than that.
Vy 73.
Martin, LU5DX
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com> wrote:
> It appears to me that many of the big rare contest stations are maximizing
> their rates by never IDing as long as there are enough assisted guys
> calling who already know who they are. This makes classic S&P particularly
> agonizing and IMO all running stations should be required to ID at least
> once every some number of Qs. I realize that assisted is a different
> category, but the guys out there who don't play my computer vs yours will
> continue to diminish in number if it's no fun...
>
> 73 HS0ZIA
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|