If / when the individual logs are released I will add them to
the 2010 IARU workbook I created. Having the exact
details about each station should provide endless hours of
"what if'ing" and data mining!
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Spots and Success in the WRTC - a little data
fordiscussion
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:13:21AM -0600, Steve London wrote:
>> A question that I have is...what were R32K, R31X, R36O, R34D, R37P, R39A
>> and
>> R39R doing differently that caused them to be infrequently picked up by a
>> skimmer ?
>
> It would be useful to have the SSB v. CW QSO breakdowns by team as well.
> I suspect R33M spent a lot more time on CW than R33A did. I love seeing
> data like this!
>
>
>> Pete Smith wrote:
>> > The following table lists the contestants in WRTC by finish order and
>> > callsign, and then shows the number of spots recorded in the Reverse
>> > Beacon Network database. Reverse beacons don't cheerlead or select
>> > which stations to spot. You can draw your own conclusions. Perhaps
>> > there is a statistician among us who can derive further enlightenment
>> > by
>> > analyzing these numbers, together with others released by the
>> > organizers.
>> >
>> > Call Place Spots
>> > R32F 1 182
>> > R33A 2 109
>> > R33M 3 316
>> > R39D 4 172
>> > R34P 5 156
>> > R32K 6 0
>> > R32R 7 106
>> > R31X 8 21
>> > R37M 9 189
>> > R36C 10 166
>> > R33L 11 132
>> > R38F 12 232
>> > R33G 13 163
>> > R31U 14 62
>> > R34O 15 122
>> > R36Y 16 59
>> > R34W 17 197
>> > R39M 18 222
>> > R32C 19 115
>> > R37L 20 139
>> > R37Q 21 247
>> > R34C 22 184
>> > R36O 23 17
>> > R38O 24 116
>> > R31A 25 302
>> > R36F 26 41
>> > R38K 27 187
>> > R38X 28 79
>> > R31D 29 111
>> > R34D 30 14
>> > R32Z 31 252
>> > R32O 32 111
>> > R37A 33 184
>> > R32W 34 142
>> > R31N 35 140
>> > R36Z 36 100
>> > R38N 37 50
>> > R36K 38 91
>> > R38W 39 79
>> > R37P 40 10
>> > R39A 41 25
>> > R37U 42 191
>> > R34X 43 76
>> > R39R 44 12
>> > R34Z 45 133
>> > R33U 46 96
>> > R36W 47 152
>> > R33Q 48 85
>> >
>> >
>> > When I first saw this, I questioned how it was possible that a station
>> > could finish sixth and yet not be spotted even once, but the scientist
>> > on our team tells me it is not only possible, but statistically likely.
>> > In any case, that's what the database says.
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> --
> Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
> kenharker@kenharker.com
> http://www.kenharker.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|