Here you have a XLS file with the % of SSB QSo´s
http://www.arrl.org/attachments/view/News/53255
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
-----Mensaje original-----
De: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] En nombre de Kenneth E. Harker
Enviado el: Lunes, 19 de Julio de 2010 11:37 a.m.
Para: CQ Contest
Asunto: Re: [CQ-Contest] Spots and Success in the WRTC - a little data for
discussion
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:13:21AM -0600, Steve London wrote:
> A question that I have is...what were R32K, R31X, R36O, R34D, R37P, R39A
and
> R39R doing differently that caused them to be infrequently picked up by a
skimmer ?
It would be useful to have the SSB v. CW QSO breakdowns by team as well.
I suspect R33M spent a lot more time on CW than R33A did. I love seeing
data like this!
> Pete Smith wrote:
> > The following table lists the contestants in WRTC by finish order and
> > callsign, and then shows the number of spots recorded in the Reverse
> > Beacon Network database. Reverse beacons don't cheerlead or select
> > which stations to spot. You can draw your own conclusions. Perhaps
> > there is a statistician among us who can derive further enlightenment by
> > analyzing these numbers, together with others released by the
organizers.
> >
> > Call Place Spots
> > R32F 1 182
> > R33A 2 109
> > R33M 3 316
> > R39D 4 172
> > R34P 5 156
> > R32K 6 0
> > R32R 7 106
> > R31X 8 21
> > R37M 9 189
> > R36C 10 166
> > R33L 11 132
> > R38F 12 232
> > R33G 13 163
> > R31U 14 62
> > R34O 15 122
> > R36Y 16 59
> > R34W 17 197
> > R39M 18 222
> > R32C 19 115
> > R37L 20 139
> > R37Q 21 247
> > R34C 22 184
> > R36O 23 17
> > R38O 24 116
> > R31A 25 302
> > R36F 26 41
> > R38K 27 187
> > R38X 28 79
> > R31D 29 111
> > R34D 30 14
> > R32Z 31 252
> > R32O 32 111
> > R37A 33 184
> > R32W 34 142
> > R31N 35 140
> > R36Z 36 100
> > R38N 37 50
> > R36K 38 91
> > R38W 39 79
> > R37P 40 10
> > R39A 41 25
> > R37U 42 191
> > R34X 43 76
> > R39R 44 12
> > R34Z 45 133
> > R33U 46 96
> > R36W 47 152
> > R33Q 48 85
> >
> >
> > When I first saw this, I questioned how it was possible that a station
> > could finish sixth and yet not be spotted even once, but the scientist
> > on our team tells me it is not only possible, but statistically likely.
> > In any case, that's what the database says.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker@kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|