To: | CQ-Contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - too much success? |
From: | Barry <w2up@comcast.net> |
Date: | Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:29:12 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Paul O'Kane wrote: > > The contesters who have freely adopted DX Cluster are those > who don't know, or don't care, about the difference between > the internet and amateur radio. > > > 73, > Paul EI5DI > _______________________________________________ > Did you forget that the DX Cluster started and performed well for many years via Packet RADIO? Packet Radio died because of a superior technology. Those who don't adapt often go the way of the dinosaurs. Barry W2UP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - too much success?, K1TTT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - too much success?, George Vlachopoulos |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - too much success?, K1TTT |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - too much success?, Paul O'Kane |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |