To: | CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improving the Fabulous CQ 160 Contest |
From: | "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net> |
Date: | Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:58:09 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Felipe: Yes, we had a four-land QSO party for years. I participated. The sponsor W4OMW/K4EG participated. Almost no one else participated. I doubt it would be more popular now than it was then. It has worked for New England because all of their separate QSO parties had basically died out. And it works for the 7th District because most of those states (except WA) didn't have a popular, active QSO party. 73, John, K4BAI. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Improving the Fabulous CQ 160 Contest, James Cain |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improving the Fabulous CQ 160 Contest, Tom Haavisto |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improving the Fabulous CQ 160 Contest, Felipe J Hernandez |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improving the Fabulous CQ 160 Contest, Julius Fazekas |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |