Forgive the obvious question, but if the contest is fabulous, what needs
improving?
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Victor A. Kean,
Jr.
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:52 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Improving the Fabulous CQ 160 Contest
For the 2010 edition of CQ 160 contest, I propose the following
changes as followons to the 2009 changes:
1. Make the exchange 59(9) grid where "grid" is 4 character
Maidenhead grid square, a-la the Stew Perry test.
2. Make the QSO point scoring proportional to distance. You could
take the Stew Perry scheme and scale it so that the longest possible
QSO is 10 (or maybe 12) points.
3. Keep multipliers to encourage DXpeditions and pile-ups.
Let the flaming begin.
Victor, K1LT
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|