I agree.
Why is this such a huge issue. It says in the rules that the call must be
given in the exchange so why can't this just be accepted? It's simply worded
and very concise.. the way rules should be.
Much ado about nothing.
73 -- Paul VO1HE
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Milt, N5IA
> Sent: November 17, 2008 22:08
> To: George Fremin III; David Levine
> Cc: mjc5@psu.edu; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange
>
> Personally I like having the callsign in the exchange. It
> allows the number and precendence to be entered and the tab
> key hit to advance to the check box while the call is being
> sent. AND, it does confirm the callsign.
>
> Mis dos centavos de Milt, N5IA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George Fremin III" <geoiii@kkn.net>
> To: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
> Cc: <mjc5@psu.edu>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 1:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange
>
>
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:26:21PM -0500, David Levine wrote:
> >
> >> As for repeating the call in the report, it does seem
> unnecessary. I read
> >> other emails in this thread and it seems to be just based
> on tradition.
> >
> > It is based on the rules.
> >
> > I like the long SS exchange and the callsign as part of it but
> > maybe that is just because I am used to it after all these years.
> >
> > I had quite a few folks not sending their calls in the exchange.
> > I am not sure why - it is not like it really slows you down much.
> > 200 hours are still possible in SS phone even with the long
> > exchange.
> >
> >
> > --
> > George Fremin III - K5TR
> > geoiii@kkn.net
> > http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.4/1794 - Release
> Date: 11/17/2008
> 8:48 AM
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|