I may have been dreaming again, but didn't Sean from the ARRL post on here
before the contest saying that your callsign during the exchange was
required ????
On 11/17/2008 1:26:21 PM, David Levine (david@levinecentral.com) wrote:
> Not sure, but not during this contest but a RTTY contest within the last
> month, someone sent me a report of 577 so I put that in as the the
> report.
>
>
> As for repeating the call in the report, it does seem unnecessary. I read
> other emails in this thread and it seems to be just based on tradition.
> During this weekends contest, the only thing it was useful for was when I
> tuned a specific freq and could catch the report before the originating
> CQ
> to see who was the op on the freq.
>
> There was someone else in the thread that indicated the callsign was part
> of
> the report in the cabrillo file but I
> don't think that is correct, or at
> least no represented that way. The report doesn't
> contain the call sign. The
> QSO record does, but it does so even if it
> wasn't part of the report. My 3
> cents.
>
> David - K2DSL
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 71, Issue 30
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:04:08 -0500
> From: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange
>
>
> Which is to say, has any one
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|