To: | "w5ov@w5ov.com" <w5ov@w5ov.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Reflections on comments about open logs, who's right, who's wrong |
From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
Date: | Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:50:19 -0000 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > If your claim is valid, I would think that it should be easy to find at > least one such log that reveals a unique operating strategy from among the > hundreds (thousands?) that are now public from last year's CQWW. > > If not, why do you suppose that is? > Bob, I'll take that to mean that you've searched them all (or at least the top 10% in your competitive category) and found nothing unique? 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 99% of uniques are busted, mike l dormann |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheaters, Logs & Self-Policing, Dave/KA1NCN |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Reflections on comments about open logs, who's right, who's wrong, w5ov |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Reflections on comments about open logs, who's right, who's wrong, w5ov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |