To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge |
From: | "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com> |
Date: | Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:53:44 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
WC1M said: > (operating arrangements involving other individuals, > DX-alerting nets, packet, Internet, etc) > > The phrase in parenthesis defines the terms ... > and it doesn't include anything like local Skimmer. Dick, I believe the phrase does include things "like local Skimmer" and the "etc" drives it home. To me the definition clearly includes Skimmer. Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted?, VE5ZX |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Why have different classes at all?, Bill Coleman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge, Dick Green WC1M |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge, Stan Stockton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |