CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge
From: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:27:19 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
WC1M said about skimming:

> > Where the technology does not represent participation by another
> > individual it does not violate the rules of the single operator
> > category.
>
>Right, it doesn't violate the current rules. But if the contest community
>wants to preserve the SO category, and not have it morph into something that
>is virtually identical to SO-Assisted, then the rules will have to be
>changed.

Which contest/rule are you referring to?

73, VR2/KBrett7Graham/p.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>