CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - What shall we do?

To: "'Paul O'Kane'" <pokane@ei5di.com>, <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - What shall we do?
From: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 08:36:34 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Spot on, Paul.

73, Kelly
Ve4xt

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Paul O'Kane
Sent: June-03-08 6:18 AM
To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - What shall we do?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Davis" <bob@reconstructinghistory.com>


> this is, simply and respectfully put, bollocks. 

Respectfully?  I think not.

> Not true?  Do not radios, amplifiers, switchboxes and
> filters cost money?  Do not towers and antennas cost
> money?  Quite the opposite of  being 'not true', it's
> self-evident to any reasonable person.

You seem to have missed the point.  Of course, all the
things you mention cost money.  But, having access to
SO2R hardware does not make anyone a competent SO2R
operator - that takes substantial self-training.

It seems to me that self-training is the difference
between SO2R and any other hardware/technology that
does not require self-training to be effective
immediately.

73,
Paul EI5DI

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>