CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

To: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>, CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
From: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Not a very good analogy Pete...

Using this logic, straight keys, bugs, paddles would
all be banned, just like horses and pedestrians from
travel on the highway.

73,
Julius

> Further to the same point - when the CQWW rule was
> written, I think we can 
> be confident that nobody considered the arrival of
> Skimmer technology on 
> the contesting scene.  In the early 20th century, it
> was law in some places 
> that an automobile had to be preceded on the road by
> a man with a red flag, 
> so that horses would not be startled.  Want to try
> to apply that today, on 
> I-95?
> 
> 73, Pete N4ZR 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 


Julius Fazekas
N2WN

Tennessee Contest Group
TnQP http://www.tnqp.org/

Elecraft K2/100 #3311
Elecraft K2/100 #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>