CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges

To: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>, n2ic@arrl.net, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges
From: "K-ZERO-HB" <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:07:10 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> 1)Why ENN in cw contest is legal and silent omission  of the default 59
in 
> SSB contest is not?

The rules call for a signal report.  "ENN" is a valid signal report. 
"Silence" is not a signal report.

> 2)If 59 found in the log of the sender as well as in the log of the 
> recipient at the time of cross checking what is the ground for blaming
the 
> sender in rules violation?

If the sender didn't send a report and the recipient didn't receive a
report, but the logs show a report was exchanged then both logs are
falsified and ought be DQ'd.

73, de Hans, K0HB/W7
"Just a boy and his radios"



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>