CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges
From: "4O3A" <yt6a@cg.yu>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:04:10 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
My friends,

I broadcasted all contest and all was very open. Tried to encourage local 
contesters to do the same and to make contesting more open here. I do not think 
that I have to make any longer comment on that subject? I Of course I gave RST 
and probably sometimes in huge pileup's gave only number, as 59 is default. I 
really push many of you back to repeat exchange number to be sure its correct. 
After many hours I did some mistakes, either, and for some you have to shot me, 
at least?? 

Two questions? 
How many times in contest you gave 59, but asked guy to repeat report many 
times. Was it 59? Why you did not gave 33 as it really was? 
Is it OK to have some exchanges, as zones already implemented in logging 
program and you just put enter, even if you did not hear report?

Now someone's have good subject and can discuss that matter next few months? 

Thanks to all who called me in WPX and lets enjoy.

Ranko

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>