CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges

To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges
From: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:52:48 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>

> I am also in favor of leaving the rule in place
> because it gives the casual contesters a small
> 'breathing' space before they enter the number.

You underestimate the skills of casual contesters.
The only breathing space they need is to hear their
own call - that tells them they're supposed to 
copy whatever is next.

How do casual contesters manage in contests with
no RST - like Field Day or SS? 

> It also sets a bad example for the beginners

The bad examples are the mindless repetition of
59(9), and the requirement for it to be exchanged
in the first place.  If CBers did this, you would
laugh at them.

73,
Paul EI5DI

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>