CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R

To: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R
From: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:04:27 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Hans

Some contests have a "Tribander?and Wires" class - perhaps adding this class to 
other contests would fill the need for the average ham who lives on a city lot 
with one tower and a tribander.

One important aspect to keep in mind is - stations are NOT equal (and there 
should not be an effort to make this so).? Some folks have big antennas?and 
live in an area that favours propagation into certain parts of the world.? 
Others live in areas that have other good and bad aspects to their stations.? 

For me, contesting is doing the best you can with what you have to work with.? 
If that means low power, no packet and no SO2R, so be it.? To compete, try and 
better last years score, or find stations with similar capabilities to yours 
and set up some friendly competition between yourselves.? That way, you will 
have similar propagation, and (hopefully) will encourage you to try a bit 
harder to best someone close to you both propagation and station wise...? Some 
contest clubs do this.

Tom





> Rather than limit just one aspect of the competition, provide an 
> entry or basic entry class with no advantages ... limit competitors 
> to one transceiver, no packet, no amplifier and antennas no 
> higher than 50 feet (or 30 feet) and antennas limited to no more
> than? .5 wavelength of total conductor.? Such a category would 
> provide an opportunity for those in antenna restricted areas and
> those who do not want to (or cannot) enter the "arms race" of ever
> bigger? antennas, amplifiers and multiple radios. 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>