CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet

To: KI9A@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet
From: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:59:18 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:11:35PM -0500, KI9A@aol.com wrote:
> This is why we need to end the assisted category, and open all classes up  
> the using packet.

There are moments when I feel like this is the solution but most 
of the time I do not feel this way.  I think there are very few
people whom I compeate against that are cheating with packet or
otherwise so I really do not see the need to alter the single op
category in such a way.  


> If SO2R is ok for a single op, why not packet?
>  

SO2R is one op with some radios finding and working stuff.

SO + packet is one op with 1000's of other ops finding stuff for him.

I find this to be a huge diffrence.

-- 
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>