To: | "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? |
From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> |
Date: | Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:51:50 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
So true. If someone busts my call, and I sent it a couple of times to correct them, and they just say TU QRZ, it gets deleted from my log unless I hear my call sent right. Most software does that automatically, so if it doesn't send the correction, I assume they didn't change it. 73 Tom W7WHY > If you didn't copy all of their information, it isn't > a completed QSO, regardless of what the other station > thinks. > > 73s John AA5JG _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQP logs Due Thursday Nov 15th, Kevin J. Rowett |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else?, Robert Naumann |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else?, John Geiger |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else?, Robert Naumann |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |