To: | Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? |
From: | Jeff Stai <jds@twistedoak.com> |
Date: | Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:39:22 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
The other other answer (besides "don't TU if you don't got it") is don't acknowledge the call in the first place if it is too weak to complete the contact. Obviously this is a judgment call and with practice you'll have a good idea of what to ignore based on signal weakness and also the complexity of the exchange for the contest (SS being "high"). Since you are rare, they will often try later. 73 and CU this weekend! jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai jds@twistedoak.com Twisted Oak Winery http://www.twistedoak.com/ Winery Blog http://www.elbloggotorcido.com/ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else?, Denis K7GK |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Anyone know how many Hams are in Belize?, KZ4USA |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else?, Kenneth E. Harker |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else?, mike dormaol dormann |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |