CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Contesting

To: <steve.root@culligan4water.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Contesting
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:31:46 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
K0SR writes: 

> I don't know that this is necessarily a requirement. It's 
> more important that the rules stipulate that you will be 
> competing against other stations in the same geographic 
> location as your remote station. 
> 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
> steve.root@culligan4water.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 10:30 PM
> To: Jim Neiger; vo1he@rac.ca; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Contesting
> 
> 
> >
> > If some are keen to "remote" in a contest, fine. But the 
> > rules should stipulate that all the radios, antennas, and 
> > operators are within the same contest multiplier entity: 
> > WAZ Zone, DXCC Country, State, Province, etc, whichever 
> > is smaller.
> >
> >Jim Neiger N6TJ

Not only should remote stations compete against stations located 
in the same geographic location as the remote station, a remote 
operation should not be eligible for inclusion in club competition 
unless both it and the operator are located within the same
Zone/Country/State/Section, etc. and within the "club circle."  

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>