Now's your chance, Herb. The way this is going, you could probably even work
yourself and it may count. :)
73 -- Paul VO1HE
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Herbert Schoenbohm
> Sent: March 21, 2007 14:22
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO
>
> Mark, N5OT four principles on remote stations are right on
> point especially in today's age of great broadband
> connectivity and latency improvements. Where the op is
> located should not be the issue, where the station is located
> is everything.
>
> Now will someone please put a remote station in the remote
> areas of Yukon and NWT so some year I can finally get a sweep
> in the ARRL DX Contest on 160 meters!
>
> 73
>
> Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
> St. Croix, Virgin Islands
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|