To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO |
From: | "Herbert Schoenbohm" <herbs@vitelcom.net> |
Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:22:13 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Mark, N5OT four principles on remote stations are right on point especially in today's age of great broadband connectivity and latency improvements. Where the op is located should not be the issue, where the station is located is everything. Now will someone please put a remote station in the remote areas of Yukon and NWT so some year I can finally get a sweep in the ARRL DX Contest on 160 meters! 73 Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ St. Croix, Virgin Islands _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL REPLY - Remote Site & Contesting Rules, Joe Subich, W4TV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules, w4ZW |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Ontario QSO Party - One Month Away!, Bob Nash VE3KZ |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO, Paul J. Piercey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |