Sure, I would love to do that... unfortunately that restriction is not a
band plan, that is a regulation. There is a slight difference.
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Cedrick "Fred" Johnson - WT2P
> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 18:14
> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843
>
> Ok-
>
> So, what's going to happen when 20M gets too full in a SSB contest? Oh, I
> think I'll just jump on down to 14.025 in SSB and call CQ because the SSB
> portion of the band is 'full' on one of the biggest SSB contests of the
> year!
>
> It definitely is a fun hobby yes, I have no disagreements there.
>
> .02p
>
>
> Cedrick "Fred" Johnson
> WT2P - ex. K9YO, N9YXA
> New York, NY 10031
> AIM: k9yo
> fredwt2p@gmail.com
> http://chibondking.blogspot.com
> Fixed Income | Derivatives | Equities | Research
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Randy Lake
> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 9:37 AM
> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843
>
> It has nothing to do with the new era of no Morse and everything to do
> with
> the band full all the way to the top during the largest world wide 160m
> ssb
> contest in the world. There is nothing illegal about working ssb below
> 1840.
> I love 160 and love cw, but I see nothing wrong with utilizing the band
> where needed for this weekend. Check the band on Monday and see how much
> ssb
> there is. If the bandwidth on ssb was 200hz or so we would not need to be
> spread out quite so much. Things will be back to normal soon ! I was
> running
> around 1945 most of the time and did work KH6MD on around 1810 this am.
> This
> hobby sure is fun !!
> 73, Randy N1KWF
>
> Cedrick "Fred" Johnson - WT2P wrote:
> > Welcome to the new era of No Morse on the bands...
> >
> >
> > 2p
> >
> >
> > Cedrick "Fred" Johnson
> > WT2P - ex. K9YO, N9YXA
> > New York, NY 10031
> > AIM: k9yo
> > fredwt2p@gmail.com
> > http://chibondking.blogspot.com
> > Fixed Income | Derivatives | Equities | Research
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> > [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> > k8vf_mark@centurytel.net
> > Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 9:47 PM
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843
> >
> > Is it common for fellows to be on SSB below 1843?
> > I havent noticed it in a while.
> >
> > Sure is tough on the 1830-35 DX window.
> >
> > What is the thought on this? I dont see why SSB is necessary below
> > 1843, which is the normal band plan.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark
> > K8VF
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|