CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] band plans - the final word?

To: CQ-Contest eMail Remailer <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] band plans - the final word?
From: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 04:37:27 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----
From: Kelly Taylor ve4xt@mts.net


>From the ARRL web site, General Practices, Interpretations and Suggestions: 
>http://www.arrl.org/contests/hf-faq.html#during

c) Band plans 

---------------------------

I am reminded of my mistake of believing that the "CQ-Contest" e-mail list was 
actually associated with CQ's Contests.  It is not.  It is a list whose purpose 
was spelled out in the original subscription notice we receive when first 
subscribing.

Within that context...

It is important to realize that the link (nice find, btw, Kelly!) is the 
opinion of ARRL-centric comentators.  As such, we must realize that:

- it is an opinion of the ajudicators of ARRL specific events or events that 
rely on ARRL rules/interpretations as a framework
- it refers to band plans that are established external to the ARRL's control 
(e.g. - IARU, Governmental Authority, Gentlemen's Agreement, etc.)

On the other hand...
... a different contest sponsor may have a differing opinion on the topic
... if a sponsor is certainly within their rights to establish contesting 
sub-bands and determine/enforce ajudication.

It is, after all, there is no "universal set of rules and interpretations".  
Each sponsor is unique, and so are their events. :)

The "final word" is probably this: If in doubt, ask the sponsor themselves (a 
simple answer with a very complicated set of hidden complexities).

Regards,
Ev, W2EV


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>