To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rig |
From: | "Mario" <s56a@bit.si> |
Date: | Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:43:44 +0200 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
W4ZV: Close-spaced strong signal performance, phase noise, etc. in a single
RX version should be better than we can imagine today. That good "single RX" has multiple frequency conversions inside! Even SM5BSZ Linrad SDR does that. W4ZV: As I said before, SDRs are not yet "contest friendly", but give it time and we may see them evolve sooner than we think. My 1991 SDR was very contest friendly but I decided to leave it there for the sake of our joint hobby. I am glad that DSP contest robots didn't appear since. Morse Runner simulator is enough fun. I guess we would end up frequency hopping on HF radios as the only way of fighting manmade QRM. 73 de Mario, S56A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] June VHF contest and six meter antennas, Jim Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] New Ham Countries;, Mario |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rig, Bill Tippett |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Ameritron AL-811 for Contesting, OK or not?, Tom Osborne |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |