CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert - LOTW User Update

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert - LOTW User Update
From: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:59:41 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Jan 25, 2006, at 4:43 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Gerdes [mailto:terry@ab5k.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:28 PM
> To: Terry Gerdes; Joe Subich, W4TV; 'FireBrick'; 'RTTY List'
> Cc: Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ; w9gig@arrl.org
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert - LOTW User Update
>
>
> RTTY ops,
>
> I need to update my post on ARRL Officials that do not use the  
> LOTW.  It
> turns out that Central Director: George R. Isely, W9GIG does use  
> the LOTW
> and is listed in the HB9BZA LOTW user list.  I made a typo when I  
> searched
> the HB9BZA list looking for W9GIG's call.  Sorry George.
>
> That bring the total ARRL officials using LOTW to 14 and the ones  
> not using
> LOTW to 25.
>
> If anyone forwarded my original post to any other reflector, please  
> forward
> this correction as well.  Thanks.
>


        So what is the point? Is not using LoTW illegal or something? If an  
ARRL official isn't into DX, or is into VHF+, and doesn't have any  
need for LoTW, does that mean they aren't a real ham? That means   
that we are supposed to boot them out?

        - 73 de Mike KB3EIA -
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>