This is really over-done. All my 77,000 QSOs are up on LOTW. Every couple
of months I do a new upload. Simple as it can be.
How many of you made this "too tough" argument to forestall converting from
WordStar to WordPerfect, or WordPerfect to Word? This is a LOT simpler
than that. I think people who still make this argument are just defending
entrenched positions that no longer make sense, if they ever did.
73, Pete N4ZR
At 11:08 PM 7/24/2005, Igor Sokolov wrote:
>I agree with Bill fully. LOTW is missing participation from a lot of
>users because of the complexity. None of those whom I know here in
>UA9 is on LOTW although there are several on eQSL.CC
>I have tried LOTW myself and gave up. I think I will wait till LOTW
>is more user friendly and then I will be able to upload my 55000 QSO
>as well as 30 000 QSO from different DXpeditions.
>
>73, Igor UA9CDC
>
>
> > At 11:53 AM 7/24/2005, KI9A@aol.com wrote:
> > >Look, all you need to do, is, 1) get the certificate, 2) transfer
>your ADIF
> > >files from your normal logging software to the tq8, then either
>email or
> > >upload the tq8 files. How much easier can it get?? Kudos to the
>folks who
> > >run
> > >LOTW, it is a great program.
> >
> > _________________________________________________
> >
> > "How much easier can it get?" you ask. Ok, here's how I envision
>it:
> >
> > 1. Go to LoTW website.
> > 2. Enter your user id and password.
> > 3. Upload ADIF file.
> > 4. Log out.
> >
> > How's that for easier? Or do you really prefer the morass of .tq5,
>.tq8 and
> > .p12 files? And what about the nonsense of every single QSO being
>digitally
> > signed? Think about that one for a minute. If I have made an error
>of some
> > kind, every QSO gets digitally signed with the wrong information.
>What
> > would be the difference from just uploading an ADIF file which I
>certify to
> > be correct just by the act of logging in?
> >
> > The important point of all this is that we are missing QSLs from
>stations
> > who took one look at LoTW and gave up because it is unnecessarily
> > complex. How many more states/countries/provinces would you have
>confirmed
> > right now if LoTW were user-friendly like it should be?
> >
> > Bill, W6WRT
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|