CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating Methods or Equipment?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating Methods or Equipment?
From: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:48:10 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
No - That UP4L score was incorrectly posted to 3830.  That 7201 is the number 
of 
QSO points, not the number of SSB QSO's !

The correct posting should have been:

Call: UP4L
Total:  1614   0   187  Total Score = 1,346,587

73,
Steve, N2IC


Tonno Vahk wrote:
> 9000 Qs - well, sounds like a new world QSO record for SO 24 hours?:)))
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bill Coleman" <aa4lr@arrl.net>
> To: "KE5CTY Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
> Cc: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 5:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating Methods or Equipment?
> 
> 
>>>Call: UP4L
>>>Total:  1614   7201   187  Total Score = 1,346,587
>>
>>UP4L has a few things going for him here. First, he operated the  
>>entire 24 hour period. Second, he operated mixed mode, which gives  
>>him the opportunity to work stations twice. He also operated more  
>>phone. Phone is faster than CW, so you can work much higher rates.
>>
>>UP4L is also DX, running high power and probably has some decent  
>>antennas. He worked nearly 9000 QSOs. That's how he managed to make  
>>over 1,000,000 points
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>