To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not |
From: | Eric Hilding <p3@hilding.com> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:50:18 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Kelly, VE4XT wrote:> If he doesn't, it's lost. I typically tune across what looks like a clear > frequency, listen for a second or two, dump a ? or QRL? and if I hear > nothing, F1 it is. What's wrong with that? Absolutely nothing wrong...except: When I operated as "DX" last Spring, after a food or shower break, I came back on 20m looking for a "clear frequency". After 20 to 30 M-I-N-U-T-E-S of "QRL?" only to have LOUD W/K stations (also heard them concurrently on 15 meters) and LOUD Europeans tell me to move, I finally said to h*ll with it and did the best I could to not end up zero beat with anyone. Maybe it's 'cuz I'm a re-tread from the 60's when I seem to recall that "DX" stations were in the driver's seat during a DX contest. But if the bands are being double-congested due to LOUD W/K SO2R stations, am I going to waste a half an hour trying to bend over backwards again? No, No and NO. I will make a maximum of 5 attempts to find a clear frequency, and continually shoo'd away by LOUD W/K SO2R stations, I will find *some* kind of non-zero beat hole and get back to work. Others will need to tighten up their filtering, or shut off one of their TWO radios, 'cuz after 5 attempts I'm calling CQ and it is NON-NEGOTIABLE. Well, OK...maybe I'll make 7 attempts just to walk the extra mile. But a half-hour? NO WAY, JOSE. 73... Rick, K6VVA
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [CQ-Contest] Pro II v.s. IC-775, BarryMerrill |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] HST, Chris Pedder |
Previous by Thread: | Fw: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not, k7qq@netzero.com |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not, Doug Smith W9WI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |