CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] The Next BIG Step in contesting

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The Next BIG Step in contesting
From: TOMK5RC@aol.com
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:32:45 EST
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 11/19/2004 9:13:36 AM Pacific Standard Time,  
dezrat1242@ispwest.com writes:

On Fri,  19 Nov 2004 09:29:42 EST, TOMK5RC@aol.com wrote:

>The gauntlet   is 
>thrown in the essence of pushing the technology envelope and,  perhaps, not  
seeing 
>another thread about how packet is  unfair.

_________________________________________________________

IMHO,  packet is not unfair, it is just undesirable.  We are getting
farther  away from being radio operators and closer to being
technogeeks.   Nothing wrong with new technology, but the direction
we're moving has less  and less to do with transmitting and receiving
radio signals by a human  operator.

I miss the old days.  :-(

--
Bill W6WRT,  certified OF
 
Pine away, Bill. We wouldn't be having this conversation if it weren't for  
technogeeks. Also, I doubt if there would even be any contesting if we still  
used Valiant's, HQ180's and bugs. Us OF's would be playing pinochle  instead.


 
Tom  Taormina, K5RC
Virginia City, Nevada
Contesting from the Comstock
W7RN  - K7RC
_www.ConsultPR.com_ (http://www.consultpr.com/) 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>