To: | "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? |
From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:45:42 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I can see how we can enforce the "do not operate on any frequency before the contest" or "don't use any propagation assistance" rules? I guess including a videotape with the log, of the entire contest, scanning the entire shack, with wwv running in the background would make sure that rule isn't violated. Simple solution. Tom W7WHY > It still feels like single-op to me. Would using GeoClock > be considered similar "assistance?" I don't think so. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick, Bob Wruble |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Getting the Rules Changed, K3BU |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance?, K4RO Kirk Pickering |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick, John Geiger |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |