I find it surprising, and disappointing, that two of the directors, K1KI
and N2FF, both of whom are contesters, voted to remove contest
results from QST. While they are under no obligation to explain
themselves, perhaps they would care to, anyway...
Personally, I find QST of little interest of value. As the League is
interested in cost cutting, perhaps they should consider a dual-
priced membership:
One for those who want QST, and another price for those that don't.
Comments?
73,
Barry W2UP
On 23 Jul 02, at 8:51, Pete Smith wrote:
> Following is from the ARRL Web, which is having server problems this
> morning, so I've taken the liberty of excerpting. Deletion marked
> with "..."
>
> ""Section News," Line Scores Moving from QST to Web; Great Lakes
> Director Steps Down
>
> NEWINGTON, CT, Jul 22, 2002--Starting next January, "Section News" and
> contest line score results will appear on the ARRL Web site rather
> than in QST. Meeting July 19-20 in Windsor, Connecticut, the ARRL
> Board of Directors voted 9-6 to approve a resolution formally
> relocating "Section News" to the ARRL Web site. "Section News" has
> appeared in the League's official journal at least since 1919. The
> "Section News" Web sites--already in place--will provide the officials
> of each ARRL section "the capability of an up-to-date information
> resource that can be tailored to the needs of their section," the
> resolution said.
>
> ...
>
> In a separate resolution approved by voice vote, the Board agreed that
> the ARRL Web site now provides a better medium to report the results
> of ARRL-sponsored contests, and line scores no longer will appear in
> QST. The change does not affect ARRL Field Day results, which will
> continue to be published in the magazine.
>
> A Web site established earlier this year now includes, among other
> features, a searchable database of contest line scores for members and
> the ability to easily analyze individual and club scores. There's also
> an on-line Soapbox to post comments and photos immediately after a
> contest, as well as an expanded narrative for each event. In addition,
> the resolution pointed out, the ARRL now offers members the free
> Contest Rate Sheet newsletter, which focuses specifically on
> contesting."
>
> It troubles me is that there is no indication of any intention to
> improve in-print coverage of contesting topics, paralleling that in
> the discussion on Section News. Perhaps one or more of the directors
> who reads this reflector can explain further.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com
Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club
>From K4JA Paul" <k4ja@crosslink.net Tue Jul 23 16:25:50 2002
From: K4JA Paul" <k4ja@crosslink.net (K4JA Paul)
Subject: [CQ-Contest] ARRL report on line scores decision
References: <E17X0ok-00032e-00@granger.mail.mindspring.net>
Message-ID: <002901c2325d$3bbec2e0$0601a8c0@gipper>
Hello Barry
My thoughts also, I have been thinking the very same thing all day long as I
read the mail.
73 Paul
> One for those who want QST, and another price for those that don't.
> Comments?
|