On Tue, 24 Aug 1999 22:29:07 -0700 (PDT) lew@teleport.com writes:
>
>Contesters,
> The ARRL CAC welcomes your input. Contact your CAC Representative
>to
>make your voice heard. The discussion is looking at possible changes
>to
>the ARRL DX Exchange. Possibilities include:
> 1) Its not broke..so don't fix it
> 2) Change the exchange to more accurately score the log using:
> a)IARU Zones
> b)Grid Squares
> c)short country abbreviations
> d)mandating portable identifiers on stations out of their call
>area
> 3) Change the exchange to eventually go to a distance based scoring
>mechanism while keeping the US/VE works Dx & DX works US/VE concept
Distance-based scoring would make the contest a lot more interesting
and a lot more fair for stations who are in a geographically-
challenged location.
I presume the current scoring system of qso's x countries or
qso's x states/provinces would be maintained, and there would
be some qso point adjustment for each contact based on distance.
For US/VE stations, they could continue to send their state or
province, and the population center of the state could be used
as the US/VE measuring point for the distance calculation. The
states and provinces would continue to be used as multipliers
for DX stations.
For DX, IARU zones would definitely work with a minimum of
hassle for the distance measuring point.
Grid squares for DX would be more precise, but may represent
an unnecessary confusion factor for casual DX participants. Is
the grid-square concept widely understood and used in DX
countries? If so, it may be the best answer.
Mandating portable identifiers for DX, and trying to figure
out a distance measurement point from the callsign would present
too many complications, I think. I recently saw a callsign
map of China, for example, and there were a zillion different
call areas. I think it would be impossible to keep that all
straight.
I say give it a try! Keep the current exchange for US/VE and have
the DX send 5nn zone or 5nn gridsquare.
Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
K6LL@juno.com
> Several of the CAC members are lurkers on this reflector..so
>discuss
>away..here and on the air and anywhere anyone will listen to whatever
>you
>feel is right.... but most importantly with your own division
>Contest Advisory Representative.
> Much better than the cut number thread isn't it?
> 73 and I remain,
> Lew CAC Chairman
> Northwest Division Representative
>
> Lew Sayre W7EW/W7AT lew@teleport.com
> P.O.Box 3110 Fax 503-391-2258
> Salem, Oregon 97302 160M thru 1296MHz
>
>
>
>--
>CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>
___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|