Subject: | [CQ-Contest] CAC Ruminations About ARRL DX Exchange |
---|---|
From: | w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner) |
Date: | Wed Aug 25 12:45:37 1999 |
Lew - Please don't require portable designators. The FCC doesn't, so why should ARRL?! It would be a disadvantage for those of us who kept an old call after moving to another call area. And, might stimulate another round of club call acquisitions, which the FCC is very down on these days... 73 Barry W2UP (portable 3, but only 4 miles from 2 land) On 24 Aug 99, lew@teleport.com wrote: -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CAC Ruminations About ARRL DX Exchange, Barry Kutner |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CAC Ruminations About ARRL DX Exchange, W2CE@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CAC Ruminations About ARRL DX Exchange, Barry Kutner |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CAC Ruminations About ARRL DX Exchange, W2CE@aol.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |