Subject: | Numeric abbreviations |
---|---|
From: | young@young.enet.dec.com (young@young.enet.dec.com) |
Date: | Thu Feb 23 16:53:37 1995 |
The purist would argue that if you are going to abbreviate 9 to N you should abbreviate the whole sequence, that is ENN is proper and 5NN is not. This would also hold for power of 1TT, which is a hybrid. ATT, used by some Europeans is consistent. I really don't care though, and I certainly wouldn't skip a QSO, much less a multiplier because the op was not using my preferred CW signal abbreviation. Paul, K1XM |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | WF3T arrl dx results, bill.lumnitzer@paonline.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | W3LPL breakdown, K3NA@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | WF3T arrl dx results, bill.lumnitzer@paonline.com |
Next by Thread: | Numeric abbreviations, KR2J@aol.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |