Re: [Amps] 572B/T160L tube class C

["Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>]

Thats as bad as some current US based idiots claiming the Shuguang 811"A" is 
equal to the old RCA version

Carl

Im still trying to get this font size and Bold problem fixed... Im NOT shouting
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Fuqua, William L. 
  To: Alek Petkovic ; Carl ; amps@contesting.com 
  Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 9:31 PM
  Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B/T160L tube class C







------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: Fuqua, William L. <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
  Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 9:27 PM
  To: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Carl <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>; 
amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>
  Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B/T160L tube class C 

  I was not sure about this one since it states a plate dissipation of 220 
Watts. 

  That is 60 Watts more than other data sheets.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
  Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 7:15 PM
  To: Fuqua, William L. <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Carl <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>; 
amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>
  Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B/T160L tube class C 

  CAUTION: External Sender


  Well, there is a section RF Power Amplifier and Oscillator Class C 
Telegrapghy in this datasheet.




  https://frank.pocnet.net/sheets/084/5/572B.pdf




  73, Alek.










  On 22/08/2021 6:11 am, Fuqua, William L. wrote:

    I am beginning to think that there were never any class C specs published 
for the 572B/T160L .
    73
    Bill wa4lav




----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    7lBhQB6anEiZinQk%3D&amp;reserved=0


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps