Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] SB-200 Mods

To: Jim <jimw7ry@gmail.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] SB-200 Mods
From: gudguyham via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Reply-to: gudguyham <gudguyham@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:03:44 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Additionally if converting the SB200 to 160 mono band, this would be the ideal 
time to ground the grids and add the W7RY QSK mod.  This would add a whole new 
dimension to the process and make it a real killer amp on 160.   

Sent from the all new Aol app for iOS


On Thursday, January 28, 2021, 7:30 AM, Jim <jimw7ry@gmail.com> wrote:

Absolutely agree Jeff and Lou.

Heathkit SB1000 or AL-80A is the way to go for multiband, (and warc) 
with 160. 160 only, then yes! Convert the SB200.


Thanks
73
Jim W7RY

On 1/28/2021 5:55 AM, gudguyham via Amps wrote:
> I agree with Jeff, adding 160 is just too much work and it would be a 
> compromise at the end of the day.  You’ll end up spending more money and time 
> than if you got your hands on a hacked 200 for CB or just one that suffered a 
> band switch blow out.  Tear it apart and build it as a mono band 160 amp 
> instead.  Now that will work perfectly and put out lots of power and it WON’T 
> be a compromise!  I’ve been there done that.
>
>
> Sent from the all new Aol app for iOS
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 27, 2021, 11:55 PM, Jeff Blaine 
> <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com> wrote:
>
> I spent a bit of time on that amp a while back.  Involved a GI7B
> conversion but warc operation was part of the goal.  I forget which warc
> band it was that the plate choke is self resonant close too, but it's
> one of them.  You would need to treat it for that.
>
> My rationale for the project was to hone my construction, amp and design
> skills so the investment has some payback in perpetuity. The amp today
> sits on the shelf with a variety of problems, never to see RF again.
>
> In fact, given I did spend a massive amount of time and money on that
> project, in retrospect I have many times strongly recommend guys asking
> me about the project to just track down an AL80b (single tube 3-500z
> amp) instead.  The AL80b is about 10x the amp in just most other than
> sentimental respects.  And it's relatively easy to sell an unmodified
> SB-200 as well.
>
> 73/jeff/ac0c
> alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
> www.ac0c.com
>
>
> On 1/27/21 9:08 PM, Jim wrote:
>> And this was converting it to ONLY 160 meters. Not adding 160 to it.
>>
>>
>> If you search on SB200 160 meters, you will find many examples.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> 73
>> Jim W7RY
>>
>> On 1/27/2021 7:31 PM, Jim wrote:
>>> There was an article in one of the 60-70s arrl handbooks about a 160
>>> meter conversion to an SB200.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> 73
>>> Jim W7RY
>>> On 1/27/2021 3:56 PM, Jim Koshmider via Amps wrote:
>>>> Has anyone in the group modified an SB-200 for 160 meters, or for
>>>> the WARC bands?  Any info would be appreciated.
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 73,
>>>> Jim,  K8OZ
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Amps mailing list
>>>> Amps@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>