It would seem to me that if the fuses had slightly different resistances then
one would blow first, followed by all the others.
Interesting question: which would go first, the highest or the lowest R?
The current would divide in inverse proportion to the R, so the
lower-resistance one would get more current. But the one with the highest
resistance would get hotter for a given current.
I think the answer is that the lower one would go first. The heat is
proportional to I**2 * R.
Victor 4X6GP
> On 20 Sep 2019, at 22:38, Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net> wrote:
>
> I don’t think fuses in parallel are a good idea :-). But probably you weren’t
> serious
>
> Vic, I am serious! Actually, I would use them in parallel to determine the
> overcurrent point then try and fine a single fuse of adequate size. That
> said, I have seen as many as three used in parallel in another amp design.
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
>
> . I don’t know what the present rectifier modules are, but rather than
> trying to protect them with a fuse, I would just make up a few strings of
> 6A10s, which are basically indestructible. Then you size the glitch resistor
> so it won’t blow up before the primary fuse blows in the event of a
> flashover. A nice 50 watt vitreous enameled one of 30-50 ohms should work.
> By the way, I don’t know what the tubes are in that amp, but I presume one or
> more triodes. A fuse in the plate circuit of a tetrode will cause the screen
> to ignite like someone hit it with the heat ray in War of the Worlds, unless
> there is a screen trip circuit.
>
> Victor 4X6GP
>
>> On 20 Sep 2019, at 22:04, Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net> wrote:
>>
>> Yesterday, I lost all four HV bridge rectifier modules in my Alpha PA-70V
>> vapor-cooled amp. After replacement, HV returned but whatever caused the
>> fault event also took out a 2N3053 switching transistor that controls
>> a 8.2V Zener bias diode from the EBS circuit. I used the opportunity
>> to change it to a more robust transistor in a TO-220 package that
>> effectively doubles Ic and Vceo. The transistor is already configured as a
>> "discrete Darlington"
>> with a 2N4401 ahead of it so the shock didn't get very far on the EBS PC
>> board.
>>
>> Going back through the list archives, I see mention of using a HV fuse
>> just ahead of an amp's glitch resistor. VE7RF recommended a second HV
>> fuse placed between one leg of the HV transformer secondary at the
>> C-input filter cap. Sounds like a nice way to potentially save the HV
>> bridge diodes.
>>
>> I have sized the glitch fuse adequately and will use a HV microwave
>> oven type as discussed in the archives. However, because of some
>> unknown variables, it's a bit tricky to calculate the HV transformer's
>> secondary fuse. I can use PSUD II software but primary and secondary
>> HV transformer ESR are unknown variables.
>>
>> I'm also a bit skeptical that a fuse on the HV secondary will work as
>> intended due to the extreme initial C charging current (35 uF/5KV
>> filter cap), even though step-start will limit the initial inrush and
>> that too factors into the equation. I could just keep stacking 900 mA
>> HV fuses in parallel until they don't blow but that isn't an
>> intelligent approach to a solution. Any guidance here?
>>
>> I don't see sand-filled ceramic HV fuses in this category and I dread
>> the thought of cleaning up glass shrapnel in an amplifier. I'm
>> thinking that Teflon heat-shrink tubing placed only over the glass
>> portion should keep the shattering damage under control.
>>
>> Paul, W9AC
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|