IF a CW SOS was not heard by the generally useless ham contingent does that
mean it was never sent?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Drivel
On Sat,4/29/2017 11:09 AM, Mark Bitterlich wrote:
But relying on CW is not going to get you killed.
To evaluate your opinion (and it is nothing but opinion, based on a
religious belief in CW), I'd like to know exactly what emergency
communications operations you have been a part of in the last ten years,
and exactly what your participation entailed. And I'm not asking about
drills or training sessions, I'm talking about real emergencies, like
tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, explosions, wild-land fires, severe storms,
landslides, and earthquakes.
FACT: CW is a great mode, no question about its advantages over voice
modes -- IF the operators on both ends are good at it.
FACT: CW is a USELESS mode if there's NOT an operator on BOTH ends who is
good at it.
OPINION: The chances of there being an operator on an FM repeater who can
copy CW are pretty slim. When I'm using VHF/UHF FM, I'm usually the only
one.
OPINION: The chances of SSB ragchewers being competent in CW gets
increasingly slim as the ham population ages. And most SSB ragchewers are
there because they DON'T work cw.
73, Jim K9YC
Founding member CWOPS, #69
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|