Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:24:33 -0800
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 170, Issue 27
That makes sense, Jay. it would, indeed, be effective for that application.
73, Jim K9YC
## are u sure ? After looking at ur cook book recipe, and other misc notes,
I still
cant fathom 2 turns inside the 6 x cores.... with one turn external to the
cores... even with
what appears to be aprx 2 inch spacing from the single external loop to the
core stack,
providing enough Z and RS for that freq ? I guessed that perhaps 3 turns
inside the core
stack and 2 external loops would have optimized the design a tad better. But
I dont have the test
gear to evaluate it. He didnt say whether type 31 or 43 used. My guess is
type 43, since its
a little less forgiving when it comes to heating. I would want the RS to be
as high as possible to
limit CM current.... esp with serious qro being used.
Jim VE7RF
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|