Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] AMPTEC LA4000

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] AMPTEC LA4000
From: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 22:16:07 -0600
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I doubt comments by guys on the reflectors is weighing in on any biz decision. Far more likely is that the bureaucratic hoops to jump over and legal risks are more substantive.

73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie

-----Original Message----- From: Riichard Neuman via Amps
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 9:57 PM
To: stevewrightnz@gmail.com ; amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] AMPTEC LA4000

My hope would be the fraternalism of ham radio would transcend the policies of governments. Isn't it still that way?

Richard K3IPK







-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
To: amps <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, Feb 2, 2017 12:43 pm
Subject: Re: [Amps] AMPTEC LA4000

On 03/02/17 06:00, Larry Williamson <larry@mygbi.com> wrote:
Remember, I have the money to send-----It's up to them to make me feel comfortable with their product! I never at one time felt good about it!

What about how they feel about US buyers?  Stateside has been
particularly hostile and derogatory about all Chinese "junk", and has
publicly, openly, and steadfastly boycotted them at every turn, on every
product they could muster.

Considering then, the fact that the US is 2% of their business, and the
rudeness shown, it is indeed possible that they don't want to talk to
you at all.

Steve

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>