Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Filament Voltage Question

To: Jim Garland <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Filament Voltage Question
From: Radio WC6W via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Radio WC6W <wc6w_amps@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Hi Jim,
   That tube employs a DIRECTLY heated filament.

Two good reasons for low voltage in this case:

   High voltage operation would require thin elements that would be 
mechanically fragile.

   Current distribution would be way whack with the potential differences in a 
high voltage setup and induce lots of hum.

73 & Good morning,
   Marv WC6W

http://qsl.net/wc6w/


--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 4/22/14, Jim Garland <4cx250b@miamioh.edu> wrote:

 Subject: [Amps] Filament Voltage Question
 To: amps@contesting.com
 Date: Tuesday, April 22, 2014, 8:19 AM
 
 I was reading the data sheet this
 morning on the 4CX3500A and noticed the
 filament requirements are 5V@90Amps.  It occurred to me
 that I've never
 understood why so many tubes with indirectly heated cathodes
 have such
 low-voltage - high current filaments. Since the only thing
 the filament is
 used for is to heat the cathode, then why not design it to
 run at, e.g.,
 115V@4A? That sure would be a lot easier to implement. I'm
 sure there's a
 reason, howevrr, and would appreciate somebody informing of
 it!
 
 73,
 
 Jim W8ZR
 
 _______________________________________________
 Amps mailing list
 Amps@contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
 
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>