Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] GS-35B Efficiency Varies with frequency?

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] GS-35B Efficiency Varies with frequency?
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 00:02:13 -0800
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:53:03 +0100
From: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] GS-35B Efficiency Varies with frequency?

The input impedance of a single GS35B is much lower then that of pair of
3-500Z

73
Peter, DJ7WW 

##  agreed.  A pair of 3-500z is aprx 60-65 ohms..and I think the GS35B is like 
aprx 25-37 ohms..so 50 ohm coax is wrong to begin with.. 

## W8Ji  used the parallel rg-58 trick to increase the eff on 10M.. on the 
ameritron amps..and the 8877 is already 50 ohms ! 

##  all  you are doing by paralleling 2 or 3 x rg-58’s  on a tube that is 
already 50 ohms  is to effectively add C to the cathode. 

##  In the case of separate switched PI nets for tuned inputs, the 10M  C2 cap 
can be mounted right at the tube itself, as Paul did..with the
provisio that less C2  is then required for the remaining tuned inputs.  
Another method is to mount a 100-200 pf  NPO cap at the cathode..
that works very good.
Parallel or triple  RG-58 will  effectively do the same thing....and is 
cheaper.   Another method is to not use coax at all....and just run a .01uf
coupling cap  from tuned input assy  to cathode, like drake did on the L4B... 
with the tuned input assy  + bandswitch right next to the socket.  

##  Unless you are on welfare, don’t mess with RG-174. 

Jim   VE7RF    



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>