Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
From: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:01:24 EDT
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Tom, your isp doesn't like me!
 
73,
Gerald K5GW
 
 
 
  
____________________________________
 From: MAILER-DAEMON@aol.com
To: TexasRF@aol.com
Sent: 10/11/2010 8:56:52  A.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Returned mail: see transcript for  details



*** ATTENTION ***

Your e-mail is being returned  to you because there was a problem with its
delivery.  The address  which was undeliverable is listed in the section
labeled: "----- The  following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----".

The reason your  mail is being returned to you is listed in the section
labeled: "-----  Transcript of Session Follows -----".

The line beginning with  "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail 
could
not be  delivered.  The next line contains a second error message which is  
a
general translation for other e-mail servers.

Please direct  further questions regarding this message to the e-mail
administrator or  Postmaster at that destination.

--AOL  Postmaster



----- The following addresses had  permanent fatal errors -----
<mtnest@hartcom.net>
(reason: 554 Failure Message looks like spam, sorry not wanted here  
q=409573092 friend_rule)

----- Transcript of session  follows -----
... while talking to mail.hartcom.net.:
>>>  DATA
<<< 554 Failure Message looks like spam, sorry not wanted  here q=409573092 
friend_rule
554 5.0.0 Service  unavailable


Final-Recipient: RFC822; mtnest@hartcom.net
Action:  failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: DNS;  mail.hartcom.net
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 Failure Message looks like  spam, sorry not 
wanted here q=409573092 friend_rule
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon,  11 Oct 2010 09:56:52 -0400


Return-Path:  <TexasRF@aol.com>
Received: from imo-da04.mx.aol.com  (imo-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.202])
by  imr-ma01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o9BDuU7X022483;
Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:56:30 -0400
Received: from  TexasRF@aol.com
by imo-da04.mx.aol.com   (mail_out_v42.9.) id r.f3f.364fd27 (37062);
Mon, 11 Oct 2010  09:56:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from magic-m23.mail.aol.com  (magic-m23.mail.aol.com 
[172.20.22.196]) by cia-db04.mx.aol.com (v129.5) with  ESMTP id 
MAILCIADB048-90c64cb3178c3e4; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:56:28  -0400
From: TexasRF@aol.com
Message-ID:  <fc7c5.143bf92b.39e4718c@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:56:28  EDT
Subject: Re: [Amps] PS ideas for solid state amps
To:  mtnest@hartcom.net, amps@contesting.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:  multipart/alternative;  
boundary="part1_fc7c5.143bf92b.39e4718c_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 9.5 sub  185
X-AOL-IP: 96.226.10.64
X-Spam-Flag:NO
X-AOL-SENDER:  TexasRF@aol.com

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Amps] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, TexasRF <=