The data is abundant and readily available to anyone who wants to open their
eyes and take a look. Decide for yourself.
Personally, I don't want anything that bioaccumulates, and doesn't break
down in the environment just because you can't get rid of it after you
change your mind.
The Kimbrough study addressed only a few of the issues related to PCBs. The
results of the study contradict Kimbrough's earlier study.
Jim Smith
KQ6UV
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Steve Flood
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:49 AM
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] pole transformer
>
> Wasn't the PCB-cancer risk debunked 10 years ago in the Kimbrough study
> (?).
> What data??? What hazards??? If I remember correctly, there never was a
> causal link between PCB exposure and human cancer.
>
> Steve KK7UV
>
> >> There's loads of data whether you choose to agree with the
> >> interpretation or not. There are plenty of safe alternatives available.
> >> It's irresponsible to condone the use of PCBs just because you
> > haven't been convinced of the hazards.
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|