Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] plexiglas isolation in coils

To: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] plexiglas isolation in coils
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Reply-to: dezrat@copper.net
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:24:04 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:37:39 -0400, you wrote:


>Ya gotta just love the wild  guesses on this reflector.
>
>Now a certain someone  run off for twenty years saying it is 
>number 14 until someone eventually tells him it is number 
>10, but of course he will never change what he says once he 
>commits to picking at someone.
>
>73 Tom

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Wild guesses are allowed if they are identified as such. Mine was.

Are you sure the early production - the one I had - used #10? Perhaps
it was changed to #10 in later production based on (bad) experience?
As you pointed out, other changes *were* made. I distinctly remember
B&W coil stock and it seems to me #10 wire of sufficient turns and
properly spaced for 160 meters would have been a pretty large coil,
and this one wasn't.

I only ask because it seems that #10 might have held up, but this one
surely did not.

Bill, W6WRT

p.s. I said 12 OR 14. Please quote accurately.
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>