Dick,
I'm glad you ran the poll. I wish you had of added the higher power just for
grins too. I'm all for folks having an amp, and have been guilty of running
over the legal limit a good bit myself. I was also guilty for building amps
that went into the "gray area". I never did point fingers at others and
complain though, when I knew I was doing the same myself.
I can tell you this, I know of some operators way down south that made the
move. They actually bought homes way out in the country. These were miles away
from the nearest town and neighbor. They made the move to do one thing, run
bucket loads of power. The move was so they didn't rip up every TV for miles
around, come over every phone, and lord help not bother anything in a hospital.
We had the hospital thing happen here until the FCC shut the guy down. However,
he ran that way for several years with his beam aimed right at St. Marys
hospital just across the river. It took several complaints to get the FCC here
to do something about it I was told be a few that work there. Anyhow, those
guys down south are running a good amount of power and getting by with it I
believe because there's no complaints. They could be tracked by the FCC, but
it's been over 10+ years for some running and not a threat has been seen. Same
as those keydowns. They're advertized right here on the net. These last for a
few days with folks staying at local hotels and have a sell set up with tables,
etc out in the open. There's several 11 meter amp builders that advertize
freely on the net which have shopping carts, and their addresses. Those have
been up for several years also. Since the FCC is not going to bother these
guys, I highly doubt they're going to do very much with the amateur radio folks
running over the limit. As long as there's no complaints, they'll keep doing
it. I think when the truth is known, it's just as bad in one community as it is
in another.
Best,
Will
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 5/20/06 at 3:13 PM PA3DUV wrote:
>> We seen some admitting to 10 KW wasn't it in the poll?
>
>We do not know Will.
>The output power steps were 3 db up, so it could be anything between 8 and
>16 kW
>3 dB steps were chosen due to the advice of very experienced members of
>this
>forum who say that a power step of less than 3 dB is noth worth taking.
>As Rich Measures concluded only 3% was over 16 kW. I actually did not
>consider to include a higher power class into the poll, but hey, anyone
>can
>make a mistake isn't it.
>
>Cheers, Dick
>PA3DUV
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
>To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 2:51 AM
>Subject: Re: [Amps] RE : who needs it? Henry 8K
>
>
>Jos,
>
>I'm glad I never started this thread or I'm sure it would have been
>stopped
>just after it started, with a threat of removing me from the list over
>complaining about the FCC again. It does bring to light something I knew
>for
>years though in that some in the amateur community were guilty of running
>excessive (illegal) power, plus were some of the very ones who pointed
>their
>fingers at the 11 meter crowd complaining about them. I'll about bet that
>there's more 2000+ watt stations running amateur than there are running on
>11 meters. That, even in 11 meters hay day. We seen some admitting to 10
>KW
>wasn't it in the poll? Plus a good number admitting to over 1500+ watts.
>And
>some folks wonder how some of the contests are won?
>
>Best,
>
>Will
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>On 5/19/06 at 8:50 PM hermans wrote:
>
>>" YAR "
>>Translated Yet An other Religeon.....!
>>Curious how one would react when overtaken by a F1 or a CANAM on there
>>regular highway......?
>>For some people the rules are made to tell us how far one can go, staying
>>legal.
>>For some other its just a reference where to start, being illegal.
>>And I just would live a couple of hundred years to satisfy my curiosity
>and
>>see 'HOW AND WHO IS GOING TO CHANGE THAT BEHAVIOUR'
>>
>>Jos on4kj os5n
>>
>>
>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>De : amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] De
>la
>>part de k7fm
>>Envoyé : vendredi 19 mai 2006 14:14
>>À : Theo Bellamy; Ampscontestingcom
>>Objet : Re: [Amps] who needs it? Henry 8K
>>
>>
>>"I am curious why so many anti-power, anti-amp people participate in an
>>amplifier mailing list."
>>
>>
>>Possible reasons:
>>
>>Taking down names?
>>Reading Rich Measures opinions?
>>Writing new laws for the FCC?
>>The same arguments work for the QRP forum for those abusers who exceed 5
>>watts.
>>
>>Colin K7FM
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Amps mailing list
>>Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Amps mailing list
>>Amps@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|